Many countries are introducing ways to prioritise health services which involves making difficult decisions concerning who gets (and who does not get) health interventions. Priority setting requires technical judgements of clinical effectiveness (what works) and cost effectiveness (is it worth the money). But these judgements are embedded in a wider set of social (societal) value judgements that underlie justifiable reasoning about priorities, including fairness, responsiveness to need and nondiscrimination and obligations of accountability and transparency.  We have been exploring how to make sure that institutions approach this in a fair and robust manner. At a workshop in london (see research page on this website) we have developed a social values framework that has been converted into a decision making audit tool (the DMAT).   See attachment below for  its content values. Working with a design company we have now created an interactive digital online version which consists of a series of questions that will allow internal and external audit of how an institution is incorporating values into its decision making